UniSUN
Charter
GENERAL AIMS
- to foster discussion and promote understanding of the wider
health endeavour as an ethical enterprise through constructive, critical engagement
- to approach issues in health and health care from multiple
perspectives including philosophy, law, medicine, sociology,
anthropology, public health, health systems management, public policy,
community politics, literature and aesthetics
- to foster an intellectual community through discussion, research
and education
- to identify and support attitudes and practices that are
exemplary, challenge those that are deficient, and initiate appropriate
responses where they are called for
- to mobilise different perspectives and to encourage participants
to "think outside their own boxes"
AIMS
IN RELATION TO
Ethics
- to position bioethics as a region of ferment rather than a
commitment to any single system of ideas that is closed off to other
perspectives
- to foster dialogue across conventional boundaries such as
humanities/sciences, quantitative/qualitative, masculine/feminine,
macro/micro, fact/value, in order to promote cross fertilization of
different approaches and perspectives
- to demonstrate the relevance of philosophy to everyday life and
work
- to engage the values of teachers and learners by inviting them
to explore the ethical rewards and concerns that arise in their
everyday life and practice, and grasp these as a source of questions,
and as opportunities for learning
- to provide opportunities to learn about European and
non-Western philosophical perspectives, in addition to the usual
Anglo-American sources
Health
professions
- to place medicine and health sciences in their social contexts
- to recognise the need for an ethical community to support ethical
behaviour
- to engage with the cultures and practices of medicine and other
health professions, and ask: Which attitudes and practices support and
which undermine the professions as ethical enterprises?
Law
- to explore the impact of the law in health care and to consider
whether and how much the law and legal processes assist in patient
care, and support ethical practice in a particular domain
- to explore how the law can function as a means for changing
practice for the better
- where the law is brought to bear, to explore whether other
processes for resolving conflict might be more appropriate and more
effective
- to help practitioners understand the law, and develop strategies
for using it to ethical ends, rather than learning simply to cope with
it
- to address risk management from a broad perspectives e that goes
beyond strategies for managing legal liability
- to challenge legal processes where these are detrimental to good
practice
Politics
- to demonstrate that ethics is inextricably political and that
politics must ultimately justify itself in ethical terms
- to take a broad approach to politics as an instrument for
achieving equity through the balanced representation of a plurality of
voices in the discourse of public policy
- to provide opportunities to explore different philosophical
understandings of democracy, as well as different practical approaches
to achieving political goals in a democratic system
Community
- to establish community as a basis for ethical commitment, and
also to stimulate critical reflection on the notion of community
- to ask: What constitutes an ethical community, and how can we
create one?
- to provide forums for participants to discuss current issues and
learn about facilitating public discourse
Institutions
- to explore the relationships between systems and individuals and
to find the effective locus for change in promoting responsible
behaviour and ethical commitment
- to ask: It is possible for an institution to be ethical? and if
so, to what extent is ethics an institutional responsibility?
- to develop an understanding of ethical management and
administration, and find practical ways to support and strengthen them
- to be critical of bureaucracy when institutions or systems
undermine ethical conduct, or foster unethical conduct
- to address concerns that ethics has become "bureaucratised" (for
example in the form of ethics committees or disciplinary bodies that
may serve other primary functions)